One-party consent means that an individual can record conversations they are a part of without the other person’s consent. Of course, you should still make sure to look at the individual laws for each state as there are a few slight differences between them. However, a general rule for one-party consent states is that if you are part of the conversation, you can record it.
Click here to read more about Two-Party Consent States
Federal and state laws that dictate the recording of conversations can differ in small ways even if they are one (or all) party consent states. Scroll down to see a brief state-by-state overview of the Recording Laws; click through each state to see a more in-depth version.
There are 37 states (+DC) that are considered one-party consent states. In addition, Connecticut can also, at times, be regarded as a one-party consent state.
*RecordingLaw.com prefers to err on the side of caution with these states as they have special provisions. Make sure to read the state rules for your specific state.
**Vermont does not have an official law related to call recording, so Federal Law applies. This makes Vermont a one-party consent state.
Note- If someone is on your property recording without your permission it is usually most efficient to charge them with trespassing instead of debating the validity of recording.
Interestingly there are much harsher and longer-standing restrictions to audio recordings than there are for video recordings. This means that surveillance and other videos without audio have much less legal red tape around them. However, for devices that do record audio the law applies (but is not limited to): Oral communication, telephone calls, conference calls, electronic communications, third party interception.
You are allowed to record a conversation in an area where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Examples of this would be in a public park, public building, or a busy cafe (where the cafe had given you permission to record). If you need to record a conversation that happens in a private place such as a person’s home it is best practice to gain affirmative consent. You can gain consent of the parties involved by:
Getting verbal or written consent prior to the recording being made.
A verbal notification being played before the telephone conversation begins. (For example: “This phone call is being recorded for quality control purposes…”).
An audible beep tone being repeated at steady intervals during the duration of the conversation.
There are many methods to transcribe audio. You can do it yourself simply in a word document, hire someone to transcribe it, or use an audio transcription service. We recommend using this transcription service because they combine the accuracy of humans with the cost-effectiveness of AI. The turn around time is 12 hours and if privacy is necessary you can have them sign a standard NDA.
Yes! You have a first amendment right that allows you to record police officers while they are in an official working capacity. A police officer does not have the right to delete your pictures, videos, or audio recordings. One thing to be cognizant of is that while you DO have the right to record law enforcement, from a legal standpoint this does not give you the right to break other laws (trespassing or obstruction being the most common).
It is best practice to gain consent of all parties by informing them that the phone call is being recorded, but typically the law applies to the state where the recording is made. So if you are in a single-party consent state and are party to the conversation you do not need to gain everyone’s consent, just the consent of at least one party.
Generally it is considered a 1st amendment right that you are allowed to record a public official while they are performing their duties. Note – This does not apply to courthouses and you should check your local laws.
Given that each state can have multiple laws regarding:
Additionally, when you are recording a phone call between two states, it is best practice to follow the laws in which the recording device is located.
| State | Simple Terms | Law |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama Recording Laws | According to Ala. Code § 13A-11-30 you are not allowed to video record people in “A place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance, but such term does not include a place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access”. | Ala. Code § 13A-11-30 |
| Alaska Recording Laws | Alaska's highest court has specifically held that the eavesdropping statute is only in place to address 3rd party interceptions. They do have specific protections in place for nude photo and film. | Alaska Stat. Ann. § 42.20.330, § 42.20.310,§ 11.61.123 |
| Arizona Recording Laws | Consent is required to record conversations in which there is a legal expectation of privacy, though consent is not required in places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy such as a street or park. One major caveat is that the owner of the telephone line may record phone calls without taking part of them (such as a business owner). | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-3001, § 13-3012 |
| Arkansas Recording Laws | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-60-120 Consent is required to record conversations in which there is a legal expectation of privacy, though consent is not required in places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy such as a street or park. | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-60-120 |
| Colorado | In Colorado it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications whether it’s wire, oral or electronic without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. Albeit there is a caveat in that recording is allowed to take place if there is no reasonable expectation of privacy such as a public place such as a street or park. | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-304 |
| District of Columbia Recording Laws | In D.C. it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications whether it’s wire, oral or electronic without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. Albeit there is a caveat in that recording is allowed to take place if there is no reasonable expectation of privacy such as a public place such as a street or park. | D.C. Code § 23-542 |
| Georgia Recording Laws | In Georgia it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or disclose communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Georgia, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Ga. Code Ann. § 16-11-66(a). Georgia does have a caveat which allows for parents to legally intercept the communications of their children. | Ga. Code Ann. § 16-11-66, Ga. Code Ann. § 16-11-62 |
| Hawaii | Hawaii recording law stipulates that it is a one-party consent state. In Hawaii, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or disclose communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Hawaii, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42. | Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42. |
| Idaho Recording Laws | Idaho recording law stipulates that it is a one-party consent state. In Idaho, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Idaho, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Idaho Code Ann. § 18-6702. | Idaho Code Ann. § 18-6702. |
| Federal | Federal law dictates that when no other law applies that it is a one party consent region. State laws will supercede this, so make sure to check your local state laws. | Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) & 18 U.S. Code § 2511 |
| State | Simple Terms | Law |
|---|---|---|
| Indiana Recording Laws | In Indiana, it is a criminal offense to use any device to intercept communications, whether wire or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. Ind. Code Ann. § 35-31.5-2-176. This applies to text messages and e-mails as well. Ind. Code Ann. § 35-31.5-2-110. | Ind. Code Ann. § 35-31.5-2-110, Ind. Code Ann. § 35-31.5-2-176. |
| Iowa Recording Laws | In Iowa, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication, as long as the recording is made without any criminal intent. Iowa Code Ann. § 808B.2. This means that in Iowa, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Iowa Code Ann. § 727.8. | Iowa Code Ann. § 808B.2, Iowa Code Ann. § 727.8. |
| Kansas Recording Laws | In Kansas, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record, listen to or amplify communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Kansas, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6101(4). This state also has a hidden camera law which forbids the recording and disclosure of intercepted images. Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6101(6). | Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6101 |
| Kentucky Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, share or use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Kentucky, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 526.020. This state’s voyeurism laws also forbids the recording or disclosure of illegally obtained images. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 531.090. | Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 526.020 ,Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 526.010. , Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 531.090 |
| Louisiana Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, use or share communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Louisiana, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 15:1303. This state also forbids the recording or sharing obtained illegally under its video voyeurism laws. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:283. | La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 15:1303. - Electric Surveillance Act, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:283. |
| Maine Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record, obtain, use or share communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication, unless the conversation is audible by normal, unaided hearing. This means that in Maine, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 710. |
| State | Simple Terms | Law |
|---|---|---|
| Missouri Recording Laws* | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they’re wire or oral, without the consent of at least one contributing party. This means that in Missouri you are not legally allowed to record a wire or oral conversation you are taking part in unless you have the consent of at least one party. t is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share communications, whether they’re wire or oral, without the consent of at least one contributing party. This means that in Missouri you are not legally allowed to record a wire or oral conversation you are taking part in unless you have the consent of at least one party. |
| State | Simple Terms | Law |
|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Rhode Island, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. It is also lawful to share the details of a conversation that has become widely circulated or available to the public. R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 (2012). | R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 (2012), R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-5.1-1 |
| South Carolina Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in South Carolina, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30 (2011). | S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-30 (2011), S.C. Code Ann. § 17-30-15 |
| South Dakota Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in South Dakota, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20 (2012). | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20 (2012) & S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-1 (2012) |
| Tennessee Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Tennessee, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. It is also lawful to record electronic communications that are easily available to the public. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 (West 2012). | Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 & Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-604 & Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-303 (West 2012) |
| Texas Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Texas, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. It is also lawful to record electronic communications that are easily available to the public. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 16.02 (Vernon 2011). | Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 16.02 (Vernon 2011) & Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 18.20 |
| Utah Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Utah, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. It is also lawful to record electronic communications easily available to the public. | Utah Code Ann. § 77-23a-3 & Utah Code Ann. § 77-23a-4 |
| Vermont Recording Laws | Vermont law does not contain any provisions regarding the legality of recording or sharing any kind of audio-based conversations. This means that Vermont is considered a one-party consent state. However, the state Supreme Court has determined that it is a criminal offense to covertly and electronically monitor communications occurring in an person’s home. Vermont v. Geraw, 795 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2002). A state high court upheld that an individual should not be under the expectation of privacy in a hospital’s emergency treatment section as any number of different people are frequently coming and going. Vermont v. Rheaume, 889 A.2d 711 (Vt. 2005). It is also considered lawful to record a conversation taking place in a parking lot for the same reason. Vermont v. Brooks, 601 A.2d 963 (Vt. 1991). | Vermont v. Geraw, 795 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2002) & Vermont v. Rheaume, 889 A.2d 711 (Vt. 2005) & Vermont v. Brooks, 601 A.2d 963 (Vt. 1991). |
| Virginia Recording Laws | In Virginia, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Virginia, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties. Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-62 (West 2012). | Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-61 & Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-62 (West 2012). |
| West Virginia Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in West Virginia, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3 (2012). | W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3 |
| Wisconsin Recording Laws | In Wisconsin, it is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Wisconsin, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 968.31 (West 2011). Evidence that is obtained by recording communication is 'totally' inadmissable in civil court cases. Regardless of who took the recording, the only way a recording can be admissable in a civil case is with the consent of the person recorded. | Wis. Stat. Ann. § 968.27 (West 2011) & Wis. Stat. Ann. § 968.31 (West 2011) & Wis. Stat. Ann. § 885.365(1 |
| Wyoming Recording Laws | It is a criminal offense to use any device to record or share use communications, whether they are wire, oral or electronic, without the consent of at least one person taking part in the communication. This means that in Wyoming, you are legally allowed to record a conversation if you are a contributor, or with prior consent from one of the involved parties, barring any criminal intentions. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-3-702 (2012). | Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-3-702 |
If you’re interested in privacy, check out our blog post on using VPNs, one of the best ways to protect your privacy online.
